Legal Opinion

Tadlock v. Otterbine

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1989No. 15936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Defendants Jim Otterbine and Juanita Otterbine appeal from a judgment entered on the first count of a six-count petition filed by plaintiffs Jo Tadlock and Bonnie Lehman seeking to establish a prescriptive easement across defendants’ property. Following a trial to the court, the judge found the allegations of Count I of plaintiffs’ petition to be true and entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs establishing an easement twenty feet wide across defendants’ property.

On appeal defendants raise four points. The first point suggests that the judgment granting the easement is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Pike v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Roberts v. QuisenberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Carpenter-Union Hills Cemetery Ass'n v. Camp Zoe, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hill v. Kennoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Behen v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Orla Holman Cemetery, Inc. v. Robert W. Plaster TrustSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Moss v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Gault v. BahmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API