Legal Opinion

Garcia-Tatupu v. Bert Bell/Peter Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 18, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11131-DPWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Defendants in this ERISA matter, involving the claim of a divorced spouse for pension benefits as a result of a nunc pro tunc state court judgment, have moved to dismiss the action. The complaint has been supplemented by the parties with most— but not all—documents referenced in the pleading. I will deny the motion to dismiss as now argued and in this Memorandum outline the need for further record development that may permit early and definitive dispositive judgment practice.

I. BACKGROUND

In connection with the motion to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia-Tatupu v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. v. Schools Interoperability Framework AssociationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API