Legal Opinion

Harry B. Saxton and Ruth B. Saxton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1972No. 71-1540PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs’ claim for damages was brought against the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 and jurisdiction al leged under § 1346(b). At the close of the evidence the district court entered a judgment in favor of the government and the plaintiffs appealed. We affirm the judgment in favor of the United States, although we do not pass on the merits reached by the trial court. We find it patently clear that plaintiffs have failed to plead facts which provide a proper claim for relief against the United States under the Federal Torts Claims Act.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tom D. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Harrison Wellford v. Clifford L. Hardin, Individually, and as Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. Zabron v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Wickersham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ellen Schneider, Eugene Schneider, David Sleight v. Usa, Clayton K. Yeutter, Neal Sox JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Oppenheimer Industries, Inc. v. Johnson Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API