Legal Opinion
Green v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1980No. 78-2739PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellants brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2674 (1976) (“FTCA”), for economic losses resulting from the application of DDT to federal grazing lands upon which appellants’ cattle were grazing. The district court ruled that appellants’ tort claims were barred by the misrepresentation and discretionary function exceptions to the FTCA. 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) and (h) (1976). We affirm.
I
FACTS
Appellants, who held grazing permits issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, pastured cattle during the period in question upon lands belonging to the Colville…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. Gerald Hogan, M.D. v. The Dow Chemical Company Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company Hercules Incorporated Monsanto Company T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc. And Uniroyal, Inc., Clara Fraticelli v. The Dow Chemical Company Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company Hercules Incorporated Monsanto Company T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. The United States of America and Ten Former Regents of the University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Muniz-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Onilea Neal v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Mt. Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. Philip J. Aguiar, Each of Said Individually and as Representative of All Those Similarly Situated v. United States of America, and Other Departments and Agencies of the United States Government, as Their Several Interests May Appear, and Successors to the Above Officials, as Necessary, Dan Ford, and His Wife, Christina Ford Individually, and as Members and Representative of a Class v. United States of America, Daniel C. Batts v. United States of America, Loughery v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.