American Renovation & Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Classical Financial Services’ Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff in this case. Both Plaintiff and Defendant have filed responses opposing the motion. Because Classical Financial Services meets the requirements for intervention as a matter of right under Rule 24 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, the motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
On July 28, 2003, American Renovation and Construction Company (“Plaintiff’), a government contractor, filed a complaint against the United States (“Defendant”) for breach of contract and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Osage Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.