Jones v. Borchardt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment in a declaratory-judgment action, appellant argues that Minn.Stat. § 641.12 (2008) was incorrectly applied and his constitutional rights to equal protection and due process were violated when Olmsted County was permitted to require appellant to pay room and board for the time that appellant spent in the Olmsted County Jail before and after he was convicted of aggravated robbery. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Andrew Jones was arrested in Olmsted County and charged with three counts of aggravated robbery. The district court set bail at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. BorchardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Jones v. BorchardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009