Legal Opinion

Jones v. Borchardt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 2009No. A08-0556PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from summary judgment in a declaratory-judgment action, appellant argues that Minn.Stat. § 641.12 (2008) was incorrectly applied and his constitutional rights to equal protection and due process were violated when Olmsted County was permitted to require appellant to pay room and board for the time that appellant spent in the Olmsted County Jail before and after he was convicted of aggravated robbery. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Andrew Jones was arrested in Olmsted County and charged with three counts of aggravated robbery. The district court set bail at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. BorchardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Jones v. BorchardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API