Robinson v. Continental Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit on insurance policy. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought to recover for a loss by fire of property insured under a policy issued by defendant company.
The policy was issued on the third day of August, 1885, and was to continue in force until July 37, 1888, being three years from the date of the approval of the written application therefor (signed by the plaintiff) by the officers of the company at its office in Chicago.
The loss occurred on October 7, 1886. The court below directed the verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
The following condition appears upon the face of the policy:
“But it is expressly agreed that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McIntyre v. Michigan State InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kavanaugh v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Wells v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Hale v. Michigan Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Crafton v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Jones v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.