Legal Opinion

Bayouth v. Lion Oil Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1984No. C-2290PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted Lion Oil Company, Monsanto Company, Saxon Oil Company and Bill D. Saxon (Oil Companies). The underlying issue is whether alleged damages to Ba-youth’s and Pope’s lands are permanent or temporary. The trial court granted the Oil Companies’ motion for summary judgment, holding the damages alleged were perma nent as a matter of law and, therefore, barred by the two year statute of limitations. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5526 (Vernon Supp.1984). The court of appeals affirmed the summary judgment. 651 S.W.2d 423. We reverse the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kraft v. LangfordTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. FrommeTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bayouth v. Lion Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. De Gonzalez v. Mission American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rosell v. Central West Motor Stages, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API