Legal Opinion
Mayacamas Corporation, a California Corporation v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, a Georgia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1987No. 86-1830PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Gulfstream appeals the denial of its motion to stay or dismiss the action pending the resolution of parallel state proceedings. We find these orders nonappealable and dismiss.
FACTS
Mayacamas, a California corporation, agreed to purchase an aircraft manufactured by Gulfstream, a Georgia corporation. Mayacamas later refused to make payments allegedly because Gulfstream increased the production and availability of its aircraft. This allegedly frustrated Mayaca-mas’s purpose, which according to Mayaca-mas was to transfer its rights when demand for the aircraft was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re School Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Moretrench American Corporation v. S.J. Groves and Sons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Kl Group v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- School District of Lancaster Manheim Township School District v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.