Legal Opinion
C.L. Grimes v. Vitalink Communications Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 6, 1994No. 93-1268PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 F.3d 1553
62 USLW 2570, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,109
C.L. GRIMES and G.W. Holbrook, on their own behalf and on
behalf of all persons similarly situated, Appellants
v.
VITALINK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; Network Systems
Corporation; Leslie G. Denend; J. Daniel
McCranie; Charles J. Abbe; Harry T.
Rein; Lyle D. Altman.
No. 93-1268.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 8, 1993.
Decided March 9, 1994.
Sur Petition for Rehearing April 6, 1994.
Thaddeus Holt (argued), Kittredge, Donley, Elson, Fullem & Embrick, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for appellants C.L. Grimes and G.W. Holbrook.
Steven J.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Hofkin v. Provident LifeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996