Legal Opinion

Prall v. Peters

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Valley county. Tried below before Tiffany, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error to recover damages for false representations in the sale of a stallion. The answer is a general denial.

On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants in error for the sum of $301. A motion for a new trial was thereupon filed and overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict.

The attorneys for the plaintiff in error claim a reversal of the judgment upon three grounds, viz.:

First — That the petition and evidence show that the defendants in error have only given their notes for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad v. WashburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Walton v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Pier v. FinchNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Culbertson Irrigating & Water-Power Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Peck v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API