Culbertson Irrigating & Water-Power Co. v. Cox
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
The Culbertson Irrigating & Water-Power Company seeks by this proceeding in error to reverse a judgment of the' district court of Hitchcock county rendered against it in favor of A. B. Cox. Cox sued the irrigating company for a balance due him on a contract for labor performed by him in constructing a ditch for said -irrigating company. For a defense the irrigating company alleged that it had paid Cox for all labor performed by him under the contract sued on. There was no reply to this answer.
Section 134 of the Code of Civil Procedure, among other things, provides that every material…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCann v. McLennanNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Ashland Land & Live-Stock Co. v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Dillon v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Williams v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Van Etten v. KostersNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Stewart v. American Exchange National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1898