Burbo v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*689¶1 — The court dismissed this suit by an owner-occupier of a new home against his builder-seller on summary judgment. The case raises two essential questions. The first is whether a breach of a builder’s implied warranty of habitability requires defects which make the house literally unlivable. We conclude that it does not. The second question is whether the owner here made a sufficient showing that the builder knew of and concealed defects to support his cause of action for fraudulent concealment and violation of the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW. We find triable issues of fact…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Davis v. West One Automotive GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- Davis v. West One Automotive GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Burbo v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Sloan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.