Legal Opinion

Heyden Chemical Corp. v. Evans

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailoe

Complainant appeals from a decree of the Chancery Court of Davidson County, by which it was held that *197Complainant, as a user of benzol in Tennessee, was liable for inspection fees imposed by Code Section 6817. Tbe original bill was filed to recover sncb inspection fees in tbe sum of $280 paid under protest by tbe Complainant to tbe Defendant.

Tbe case was beard by tbe Chancellor on tbe bill, tbe answer of tbe Defendant and a single deposition taken by tbe Complainant. Tbe deposition is tbat of an engineer, C. J. Adams, wbo lias been an employee of Complainant since 1943. From tbe original bill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hamilton Nat. Bank v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sealed Power Corp. v. StokesTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Fort v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API