Legal Opinion

Kelling v. Froemming Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1926No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

The claim in this case is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, by the widow and son of one of defendant’s employees who was injured in an automobile accident and subsequently died from the effects of his injuries. The referee’s finding in favor of claimants was sustained by the compensation board. On appeal to the common pleas, however, the finding of the board was reversed, ■ and judgment entered for defendant on the ground that sufficient proof was not presented to show decedent was acting in the course of his employment at the time the accident occurred.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Wilhelm v. Angell, Wilhelm & ShreveMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Livers v. Graham Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Krapf v. ArthurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API