Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 2006No. C031721DRC; A127322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, S. J.

Wife appeals and husband cross-appeals from the property division in this dissolution of marriage proceeding. Wife contends that the trial court erred in its apportionment to her of a survivor annuity that is a part of husband’s pension. She contends, further, that the court erred in its division of the pension. Husband asserts that the court erred in ruling that his premarital equity in the residence is a marital asset. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), we modify the judgment and affirm as modified on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

The parties were married in 1984…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re the Marriage of CollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SauterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API