Legal Opinion

Niemann v. Grand Central Market, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1959No. 8670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for illness resulting from trichinosis allegedly contracted from meat sold by the defendant. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict of the jury, defendant appeals.

The record evidences that on the 24th of June, 1955, Mr. and Mrs. Niemann purchased ground beef and other groceries at defendant’s place of business. This ground beef was later seasoned, mixed with raw egg and eaten, uncooked, by plaintiffs. Some ten days later, on July 4th, Mr. and Mrs. Niemann fell ill; by July 14th all the plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Horsley v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dahnken v. George Romney & Sons Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FIRST SEC. BANK OF UTAH, NAT. A. v. Ezra C. Lundahl, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Naujoks v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Morris v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. FIRST SEC. BANK OF UTAH, NAT. A. v. Ezra C. Lundahl, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Naujoks v. SuhrmannUtah Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API