Legal Opinion
In Re: Marcus Albert Romero and Natalie Victoria Romero
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 27, 2025No. 5:23-cv-01010Unknown
1Opinion
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE MARCUS ALBERT ROMERO Case No. 5:23-cv-01010-FLA AND NATALIA VICTORIA Case No. 5:23-cv-01907-FLA 12 ROMERO, Case No. 6:22-bk-12942-WJ 13 Appellants. ORDER AFFIRMING 14 BANKRUPTCY COURT’S MAY 2 15 AND SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 ORDERS 16 17 RULING 18 Appellants and Debtors Marcus Albert Romero and Natalia Victoria Romero 19 (“Appellants” or “Debtors”) appeal Orders by the United States Bankruptcy Court for 20 the Central District of California (the “Bankruptcy Court”) in Case No. 6:22-bk- 21 12942-WJ (the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- In Re a & C Properties, Debtors. William W. Martin, Superseded by Gilbert Robinson, in Intervention v. William E. Kane, Barbara Kelly, K & K Properties, Inc., and Investors Replacement, Inc., William W. Martin, Objectors-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Gilbert Robinson, Trustee in Bankruptcy, in InterventionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.