Legal Opinion

Keaik v. Dedvukay

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 2, 2008No. Case 07-13198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

The petitioner, Ali Mohamed Keaik, seeks de novo review of his application for citizenship, as is his right under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c), after his application was denied by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS). The petitioner, a young man from Lebanon, argues that the CIS erroneously found a lack of good moral character. According to the petitioner, the CIS placed undue weight on relatively minor traffic offenses that do…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Westfield Insurance Co. v. Tech Dry, Inc. Gayle WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Etape v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. United States v. RebeloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  3. Saubhayana v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API