Legal Opinion

Light & Co. v. Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1900PublishedCited by 18 opinions

STROM HAMILTON. Appeal from. Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. jVL. McConnell, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtMoAjjster, J.

This is a suit upon a policy of fire insurance. The property covered by the policy comprised horses, carriages, and harness employed in complainant’s livery stables on Broad street, in the city of Chattanooga. The amount of the indemnity was $600, distributed as follows, to wit: $275 on live stock, $275 on rolling stock, carriages, buggies, etc., and $50 on the harness, combs, etc. On the night of November 13, 1898, the entire property was destroyed by fire. The defendant company resisted the payment of the' policy upon the ground of a breach of the following stipulations in the contract of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dupreau v. Hibernia InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Johnson v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Payne v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API