People v. Santmyer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly exercised its discretion in excluding evidence of the complainant’s prior sexual encounter with another prosecution witness (see, CPL 60.42 [5]; People v Baldwin, 211 AD2d 638, lv denied 85 NY2d 935). The court properly permitted the prosecutor to question defendant about a previous assault conviction after defendant "opened the door” to such inquiry by testifying that he was not a violent person (see, People v Rios, 166 AD2d 616, 618, lv denied 77 NY2d 842). Defendant bore the burden of seeking an advance ruling on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MastinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- SNYDER, JEREMY, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013