Legal Opinion

People v. Santmyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly exercised its discretion in excluding evidence of the complainant’s prior sexual encounter with another prosecution witness (see, CPL 60.42 [5]; People v Baldwin, 211 AD2d 638, lv denied 85 NY2d 935). The court properly permitted the prosecutor to question defendant about a previous assault conviction after defendant "opened the door” to such inquiry by testifying that he was not a violent person (see, People v Rios, 166 AD2d 616, 618, lv denied 77 NY2d 842). Defendant bore the burden of seeking an advance ruling on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MastinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. SNYDER, JEREMY, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API