Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 13, 1941No. 817Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

313 U.S. 289

61 S.Ct. 995

85 L.Ed. 1361

ROYAL INDEMNITY CO.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 817.

Argued May 7, 1941.

Decided May 26, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1941.

Mr. Harry S. Hall, of New York City, for petitioner.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 290-291 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Edward J. Ennis, of New York City, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · StoneJustice Stone

1

A collector of internal revenue, who had accepted a surety bond filed with him by a taxpayer to accompany his claim for abatement of income tax, consented to termination of all liability upon the bond and surrendered it before its obligation was fully satisfied. The questions…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API