Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Nutt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1985No. 83-1673Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

472 U.S. 648 (1985)

CORNELIUS, ACTING DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

v.

NUTT ET AL.

No. 83-1673.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 7, 1985

Decided June 24, 1985

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Charles A. Rothfeld argued the cause pro hac vice for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Acting Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, David M. Cohen, and George M. Beasley III.

Charles A. Hobbie argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Mark D. Roth.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · BlackmunJustice Blackmun

Under the Civil…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API