Spaulding v. Taylor
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, District Judge.
This is a habeas corpus action. The sole question to be determined by this court is whether or not the refusal to appoint an attorney to represent an indigent defendant on appeal constitutes a denial of due process which would warrant the release of the petitioner. The question involves the retroactive application of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963). For the reasons hereinafter set forth we hold that the petitioner is entitled to release.
Spaulding, the petitioner, presented his present petition for a writ of habeas corpus…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gaitan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Travis O. Spaulding v. J.C. Taylor, Warden, U.S. PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baggett v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Spaulding v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Donnell v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
- Peterson v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.