Harris v. Jay

Action by appellee Mary A. Jay against appellant David E. Harris on a promissory note calling for $400, payable one year after date. Complaint in usual form was answered by verified denial, and on the trial, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the sole defense of Harris was that he had not executed the note.

Error is predicated upon the action of the court in overruling motion for new trial, and the only ground for new trial which will require consideration is that of newly discovered evidence.

The note in suit, and which was introduced in evidence, bears the date of May 1,…