Legal Opinion

Fechheimer Bros. v. Barnwasser

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 20, 1944No. 136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This case is before me on motion of several of the defendants to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that this court does not have jurisdiction of the action.

Plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation and resident of the State of Ohio and that all defendants are residents of the State of Kentucky. There are 136 defendants, more or less, who, it is charged by the plaintiff, comprised an organization for military purposes in Kenton County, Kentucky, under the name “Second Regiment Kentucky Active Militia”; that they, through their *395agent, Arthur J. Daly, purchased from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. McDaniel v. TraylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. Pearce v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Brown v. HughesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance v. CokerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API