Fechheimer Bros. v. Barnwasser
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
This case is before me on motion of several of the defendants to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that this court does not have jurisdiction of the action.
Plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation and resident of the State of Ohio and that all defendants are residents of the State of Kentucky. There are 136 defendants, more or less, who, it is charged by the plaintiff, comprised an organization for military purposes in Kenton County, Kentucky, under the name “Second Regiment Kentucky Active Militia”; that they, through their *395agent, Arthur J. Daly, purchased from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- McDaniel v. TraylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rutherford v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Pearce v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Brown v. HughesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Manufacturers Casualty Insurance v. CokerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1954