Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Hill

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 9, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01190Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 NOEMI DEL CARMEN ACOSTA, Case No.: 19-cv-01190-H-KSC 14 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 15 v. RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING RESPONDENT’S 16 RICK HILL, WARDEN, MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION 17 Respondent. FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 18 [Doc. Nos. 6 and 11.] 19 20 21 Noemi Del Carmen Acosta, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 22 Corpus (the “Petition”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

on June 24, 2019. (Doc. No. 1.) The 23 Petition raises two claims: (1) that she was provided ineffective…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  3. Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Nichols v. LoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
  5. Nelson v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API