Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Hirsch
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 3, 1979No. 78-25PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
Moe Hirsch appeals from a final judgment which increased, from $110 to $270 a week, the support provisions of a separation agreement with his now ex-wife, the present appellee, Fay Hirsch; which granted her additional lump sum payments for the purchase of a new car and for the repayment of medical expenses; and which awarded her $15,000 in attorney’s fees. We reverse the judgment below.
In a prior appearance of this case, Hirsch v. Hirsch, 309 So.2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), we specifically held that New York law is applicable to the present controversy, stating at 309 So.2d 49-50:
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McMains v. McMainsNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Silver v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hirsch v. HirschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Bradley v. BradleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Gardner v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosen v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Muss v. MussDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- D. Bruce McMahan v. William A. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- D. Bruce McMahan v. William A. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001