Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Hirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1975No. 74-1348PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

309 So.2d 47 (1975)

Moe HIRSCH, Appellant,

v.

Fay HIRSCH, Appellee.

No. 74-1348.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 18, 1975.

Rehearing Denied March 19, 1975.

Haves & Teller, Miami, for appellant.

Abbott, Frumkes & Alhadeff, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., NATHAN, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

NATHAN, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the husband challenging an order of the trial court granting temporary attorney's fees to the wife and striking all of the husband's pleadings. We are entertaining this cause on interlocutory appeal for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Thursby v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. De La Portilla v. De La PortillaSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Buck Plumbing, Inc. v. Bel-Aire, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dept. of M. Veh., Etc v. Mercedes-Benz, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Maritime Ltd. Partnership v. Greenman Ad. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Coral Gables Imported Motorcars, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Waltham A. Condominium Ass'n v. Village Man., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Berry v. BerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API