Legal Opinion
State v. Depew
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 5, 1938No. [No. 22, October Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
In this proceeding the question presented is whether a person employed by the State of Maryland as an auditor, who, in order to perform his duties in various parts of the state, uses, in going to and from such assignments, an automobile furnished him by the State Auditor, is thereby, in so using said vehicle, a chauffeur, within the purview of section 173 of article 56 of the Code (Supp. 1935).
It is admitted that at the time of his arrest appellee was so employed and was returning from Frederick to Baltimore City in company with others similarly employed; that he had an operator’s license,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. E. Norris Coal Co. v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Des Moines Rug Cleaning Co. v. Automobile UnderwritersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- State v. WimmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. Ritter, New York County Courts1922
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Toler v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Darling Shops Delaware Corp. v. Baltimore Center Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Richardson v. James Gibbons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Niemotko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.