Legal Opinion
Kiefer v. Ceridian Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1997No. Civ. 3-95-818 (RHK/FLN)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Kenneth Kiefer (“Kiefer”) and Michael Doyle (“Doyle”) brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants failed to pay a class of approximately 12,000 Ceridian Corporation retirees the proper lump-sum retirement benefits to which they were entitled under four, jointly administered, pension plans (“the Plans”). Plaintiffs assert causes of action for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”); breach of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Novella v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International HotelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Miele v. Pension Plan of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Laurenzano v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. Retirement Income TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.