Murrow v. Heath
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polle District Court. — Hon. Hugh Brennan, J udge. Appeal from a decree confirming tbe county treasurer’s assessment of omitted property.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
About August 31, 1906, the defendant received from the county treasurer notice that, as informed, “certain moneys and credits” belonging to him or under his control, in the amount of $250,000 in 1906, and in each of the four preceding years, had been omitted from assessment, and September 14th at ten o’clock a. m. was designated as the time of hearing. At that time defendant appeared before the treasurer, but that officer referred him to the person employed under chapter 50, Acts 28th General Assembly, to discover omitted property, and commonly known as the tax ferret law, and after some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- City Council of Marion v. National Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Gibson v. CooleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Wahkonsa Investment Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- City Council of Marion v. Cedar Rapids & Marion Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morril v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Bennett v. Finkbine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Dowling v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Yeoman Mutual Life Insurance v. State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940