Legal Opinion

City Council of Marion v. Cedar Rapids & Marion Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — 'Hon. H. M. Eemley, Judge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaveR, J.

The appellant, having its principal place of business in Cedar Eapids, Iowa, owns and operates an electric street railway between the cities of Cedar Eapids and Marion; a part of its line and appurtenances being within the corporate limits of the latter city. By one of its officers, appellant listed that part of the property within the jurisdiction of Marion for taxation. By the plan adopted, instead of valuing the property in a single item, as a railroad, or fractional part of a railroad, it was listed as follows:

Track, etc. $ 4,712 00

Total actual value of personal.8,652 00

“ “ “ “ real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neenan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Frost v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Kephart v. Farmers' & Mechanics' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maytag Company v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Simons v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Soifer v. Floyd County Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. City Council of Marion v. National Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API