Legal Opinion

Heath v. Kiger

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 2007No. 1 CA-SA 06-0197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action arises from the trial court’s granting of the Yavapai County Attorney’s Office’s (State) motion to hold Sarah M. Heath (Petitioner) without bond, pursuant to Article 2, Section 22.A.2, of the Arizona Constitution. Petitioner argues that the trial court erred because at the time she was ordered detained, she was released on her own recognizance (OR) and not “admitted to bail” under Art. 2, § 22.A.2. We previously issued an order accepting jurisdiction, granting relief and stating that Art. 2, § 22.A.2, of the Arizona Constitution did not prevent a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Fernandez v. RomoArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Pelekai v. WhiteHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heath v. KigerArizona Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API