Doe v. Clark County School District
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JOHN DOE, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00284-GMN-BNW 5 vs. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et MOTION TO DISMISS 7 al., 8 Defendants. 9 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”), (ECF No. 56), filed by 10 Defendant Clark County Education Association (“CCEA”). Plaintiffs filed a Response, (ECF 11 No. 60), to which Defendant filed a Reply, (ECF No. 63). 12 Because CCEA does not receive federal funding obligating it to conform to Title IX 13 requirements, nor is it a state actor under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.