Legal Opinion
Eule v. Eule Motor Sales
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 10, 1961Published
1Opinion of the Court
34 N.J. 537 (1961)
170 A.2d 241
ALICE EULE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
EULE MOTOR SALES AND RUSSELL A. BOERTZEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 6, 1961.
Decided April 10, 1961.
Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. William J. Scanlon, on the brief).
Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for defendant-respondent Eule Motor Sales (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys; Mr. Kevin M. O'Halloran, on the brief).
Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for defendant-respondent Russell A. Boertzel (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- United States v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Koplik v. C. P. Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.