Legal Opinion

Cecily Considine v. George Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 2013No. A12A1674Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MCFADDEN and MCMILLIAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ March 13, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A1674. CONSIDINE v. MURPHY & McINVALE, P.C. BARNES, Presiding Judge. Cecily Considine filed suit against George W. Murphy and Murphy & McInvale, P.C. (collectively, “Murphy”), alleging that Murphy committed malpractice while serving as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cameron v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Anderson v. FlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Bonner v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Dearing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Kidd v. UngerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API