Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Societe Generale

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1995No. 94 Civ. 1649 (JGK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KOELTL, District Judge:

The plaintiff, Anne Dailey (“Dailey”), brought this action against her former employer, Societe Generale (“the Bank”), on March 10, 1994. Dailey alleged that the Bank had intentionally discriminated against her by paying her less compensation than it paid male employees for work of substantially equal skill, effort and responsibility under similar working conditions. She also alleged that the Bank intentionally retaliated against her by terminating her because of her complaints to people at the Bank about discrimination. Dailey brought her claims under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Samuel S. SONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVES LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Clarke v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anne DAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOCIETE GENERALE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Luciano v. Olsten Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Iannone v. Frederic R. Harris, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Perdue v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  5. Argyle Realty Associates v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API