Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Heath

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1924No. Crim. No. 2661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner is detained in the California state prison at Folsom and seeks a writ of habeas corpus.

The judgment under which he is imprisoned sentenced petitioner to be confined in the California state prison according to law. The petitioner was convicted of the crime of robbery after a prior conviction of a felony. (In re Heath, 49 Cal. App. 657 [194 Pac. 68].) The punishment fixed by law is life imprisonment. (In re Heath, supra; secs. 213 and 667, Pen. Code.) The petitioner contends that inasmuch as the indeterminate sentence law does not apply (In re Heath, supra), that it was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API