Ex Parte Heath
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner is detained in the California state prison at Folsom and seeks a writ of habeas corpus.
The judgment under which he is imprisoned sentenced petitioner to be confined in the California state prison according to law. The petitioner was convicted of the crime of robbery after a prior conviction of a felony. (In re Heath, 49 Cal. App. 657 [194 Pac. 68].) The punishment fixed by law is life imprisonment. (In re Heath, supra; secs. 213 and 667, Pen. Code.) The petitioner contends that inasmuch as the indeterminate sentence law does not apply (In re Heath, supra), that it was the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935