Legal Opinion

Brazell v. Brazell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1942No. Civ. 13554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

The parties to this divorce action were married in 1934, and lived together until 1941. Theirs was a tempestuous life, which culminated in the wife filing her complaint for divorce. She accused her husband of beating her up on several different occasions; of failing and refusing to work during the whole time of the marriage; and of being drunk most of the time. In his answer, the husband accused her of drunkenness, and of corresponding with, and having improper relations with other men. After a lengthy trial, in which there was testimony in support of all of the above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crehore v. CrehoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Varney v. VarneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Franke v. FrankeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gondouin v. GondouinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API