Legal Opinion
Reed Enterprises v. Clark
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 1968No. Civ. 1744-65, 2562-65 and 3009-65PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before TAMM, Circuit Judge, and SIRICA and CORCORAN, District Judges. CORCORAN, District Judge.
The above numbered actions were consolidated since they raise identical constitutional issues for decision by a three-judge panel convened pursuant to 28 U. S.C. §§ 2282-2284.
In each case the plaintiffs originally sought the convocation of a three-judge court to secure injunctive and declaratory relief on grounds that a 1958 amendment to the venue provisions of the Federal Obscenity Statutes violated their constitutional rights.
In each instance the District Judge to whom application for a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Jesse EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Alessandro Moncini, Aka: Sandro MonciniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Marvin Miller, Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publications v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Walter "Frenchy" BagnellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.