Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter "Frenchy" Bagnell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 28, 1982No. 81-5384PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Walter Bagnell, challenges his conviction under the federal obscenity statutes. After trial by jury, Bagnell was convicted under two counts charging use of a common carrier for the interstate transportation of obscene material, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462, 1 and two counts charging interstate transportation of obscene material for purposes of sale and distribution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1465. 2 On appeal, Bagnell asserts numerous errors, none of which is meritorious. We therefore affirm. 3
In early 1977 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Robyn Douglass, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Augustin GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edward J. ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- United States v. William L. ThomaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.