Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1974No. State 42PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The court’s acceptance of Hall’s guilty plea and its finding of guilt are not contested. The only issue raised is whether Hall was denied effective counsel at sentencing because the same lawyer represented both Hall and Dixon.

The record shows that Hall’s attorney made a sentencing plea to the court in which he stated that Dixon should receive the more lenient sentence of the two. He stated that Dixon “was the less . . . aggressive in the act,” and that he had been “the victim of circumstances and the people surrounding him.”

*308It is because at sentencing Ms counsel made a comparison of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. KollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Keller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Spencer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API