Legal Opinion

Harris v. Fry & Kain

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1943No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 42,080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boyles, C. J., On leave granted, defendants Michigan Life Insurance Company and its insurance carrier, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, prosecute appeal in the nature of certiorari from an award of the department of labor and industry granting compensation benefits to plaintiffs. The right to compensation is not in dispute. The issue is as to which of two defendants was the employer, and therefore liable for compensation.

Plaintiffs are the dependents of John Harris and Ernest Martin, deceased. These two men were killed May 8, 1941, when dirt caved in upon them while they were laying tile in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Hayes Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Neumeier v. City of MenomineeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Weenink v. Allen Electric & Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Allen v. Kendall Hardware Mill Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Covel Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Williams v. LangMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McVicar v. Harper HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Roman v. Delta Broadcasting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Williams v. LangMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API