Legal Opinion

Val and Laree Westover v. Jase Cundick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2017No. Docket 44046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Val and LaRee Westover appeal from the district court’s judgment and denial of their request for writs of mandate and prohibition against Franklin County Assessor Jase Cun-dick. The dispute arose when the Westovers granted an easement to Rocky Mountain Power on property owned by the Westovers. Based on his office’s records, Cundick sent a letter to Rocky Mountain Power stating that the Westovers did not own the property in question. The Westovers sought a writ of mandate to require Cundick to retract the letter and a writ of prohibition to prevent him from sending such letters…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. HouselIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lane Ranch Partnership v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Butters v. HauserIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Edwards v. Industrial Commission of the StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt. ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Petrus Family Trust Dated May 1, 1991 v. KirkIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Idaho State Athletic Commission v. Office of the Administrative Rules CoordinatorIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Idahoans United for Women and Families v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Idahoans United for Women and Families v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API