Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance v. City of Clare

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1994No. Docket 96191PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs are insurance companies that seek a declaratory judgment concerning their obligations to a municipality that they in*3sure. In circuit court, they sought summary disposition of their claim that the insurance contracts exclude coverage under the circumstances of this case. The circuit court denied summary disposition, but the Court of Appeals ordered the circuit court to reconsider the plaintiffs’ motion.

We hold that the circuit court erred in its interpretation of the policy language, and we vacate the Court of Appeals order and the order in which the circuit court denied the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Polkow v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. People v. LaVearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. American InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Radenbaugh v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API