Sharpleigh v. Surdam
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee
In equity.
1Opinion of the Court
EMMONS, Circuit Judge.
In all the cases where the complainants are in possession, judgments already rendered in the federal courts fully sustain the jurisdiction. In Gilman v. Sheboygan, 2 Black [67 U. S.] 510; Slater v. Maxwell, 6 Wall. [73 U. S.] 268; Dows v. City of Chicago, 11 Wall. [78 U. S.] 108. and the New York, Virginia, and Illinois cases, cited and approved in them, the irregularity complained' of did not appear on the face of the proceedings, but extrinsic evidence was necessary to show it. When the deed threatened or executed is made evidence by the statute, and the subject of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Striker v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- De Treville v. SmallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Crooke v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Blackwood v. Van VleetMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strode v. WasherOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Home Insurance v. GainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923