Legal Opinion

Nowalk Et Ux. v. Hileman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1935No. Appeals, 136 and 137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

These cases were tried together, before the same jury. They will be considered and disposed of in one opinion. They were originally brought before an alderman and came into the common pleas on appeals from his judgments.

The case in which there are two plaintiffs was based on a written contract of hiring by which the defendant employed Carl Nowalk and Elsie Nowalk,—husband and wife—, as janitors for an apartment building owned by him, for such time as he might require their services, agreeing to pay them $70 a month, in semimonthly payments, and an additional $10 a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emmons v. McCreerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Keiter v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Steinberg v. M. Nathan Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Orner v. T. W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Roney v. Clearfield County Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API