Legal Opinion

Hull v. Godfrey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Kearney county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

The plaintiff in error brought this action originally, in replevin, before a justice of the peace of Lincoln township, in Kearney county, alleging a special ownership in the goods and chattels, twelve cottage bedsteads, twelve sets of bed-springs, six mattresses, twelve hard-bottom chairs, seven washstands, one six-lid cook stove, and one refrigerator, on account of a chattel mortgage, filed for record January 21, 1888, given by Emma E. Warner, the owner, to secure promissory notes for $150, held by plaint*205iff, subject to a prior mortgage of defendants for $42.38, dated December…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newlean v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Knox v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pecker v. SilsbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Jordan v. Hamilton County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dwight v. Scranton & Watson Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houdeck v. Merchants & Bankers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API