Legal Opinion
Sebring Associates v. Coyle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 6, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
790 A.2d 225 (2002)
347 N.J. Super. 414
SEBRING ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey Partnership; James N. Canino; and Anthony R. Palmeri, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Eugene J. COYLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 9, 2002.
Decided February 6, 2002.
Anthony P. Ambrosio, Bloomfield, argued the cause for appellant, (Ambrosio, Kyreakakis, Dilorenzo, Moraff & McKenna, attorneys; Mr. Ambrosio, of counsel and on the brief; Andrew J. Kyreakakis, on the brief).
Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for respondents, (Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, Newark,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. BaroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Hansford v. Maplewood Station Business ParkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Magrini v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Huertas v. Galaxy Asset ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Saffos v. Avaya, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Borden v. CADLES OF GRASSY MEADOWSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- In re the November 2, 2010 General ElectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Sebring Associates. v. CoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.